New PROTECT publication

As a consequence of global warming, sea level is rising almost everywhere around the globe. This is the result of melting glaciers and ice sheets, global warming of the ocean but also changes in ocean currents. We call this last contribution Ocean Dynamic Sea level (ODSL).

Why are CMIP6 models projecting a larger increase in ocean dynamic sea level in the North Sea over the coming century than CMIP5 models? We point out a few processes that play a role in this new publication: “Processes explaining increased ocean dynamic sea level in the North Sea in CMIP6“.

Ocean dynamic sea level (ODSL) is expected to be one of the major contributors to sea level rise in the North Sea during the 21st century. This component is defined as the spatial sea level anomaly due to ocean currents, wind stresses and local thermosteric and halosteric effects. Climate models from CMIP5 and CMIP6 show a large spread, as well as an increase between CMIP5 and CMIP6 North Sea ODSL projections. 

(a)–(c) Multi-model median ODSL change at the end of the century (2081–2100) under an intermediate emission scenario compared to reference period 1900–1949. For CMIP5 (a), CMIP6 (b), and the difference between the two ensembles (c). The North Sea is indicated by the black box. (d)–(f) Time series of spatially averaged ODSL change for CMIP5 (blue) and CMIP6 (red) for the North Sea for low (d), intermediate (e), and high (f) emission scenarios. The thick line represents the median and the shaded area indicates the 17%–83% uncertainty range. The base line period is marked by grey shading. Bars right of the plot indicate the median, and 66% and 90% ranges of the projected change averaged over 2081–2100.

In this study, we apply linear regression models on CMIP5 and CMIP6 data to get a better understanding of the processes that influence ODSL change in the North Sea. We consider three different predictors: global mean surface air temperature (GSAT), global mean thermosteric sea level, and the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC). 

We find that neither global surface air temperature nor global mean thermosteric sea level can reproduce ODSL projections based on a linear relation in CMIP6, whereas this was the case for CMIP5.

Including the strength of the AMOC as an additional predictor enables us to reproduce long-term changes in ODSL for both ensembles. Our results show that ODSL in the North Sea is projected to increase with increasing GSAT and weakening AMOC. The sensitivity to the AMOC increased in CMIP6, which points to a difference in model dynamics between CMIP5 and CMIP6, and a more important role of the deep ocean. 

Ensemble-averaged regression for CMIP5 (a) and CMIP6 (b) using predictor variables GSAT and AMOC. The x-axis covers the historical run, and three scenario runs for low, intermediate and high emissions

To investigate this further, we analyse mixed layer depth data in the North Atlantic. This serves as a proxy for heat and salt transport divergence which is not available in many of the CMIP models.

We find that models with a relatively deep mixed layer in the Greenland Sea over the period 1985–2004, project larger rise in ODSL in the North Sea for both CMIP5 and CMIP6. This implies that the location of deep water formation in the North Atlantic, indicated by a deep mixed layer, potentially influences ODSL in the North Sea. 

(a), (b) ODSL time series for three groups of models: LS models (black), GS models (red) and IS models (blue) (c), (d) ODSL time series for two groups of models: GS>170m  models (red) and other models (grey). Thin lines represent the time series of the individual models, and thick lines represent the median of the groups. The reference period 1900–1949 is marked by grey shading. Bars right of the plot indicate the median, and 66% and 90% ranges of the projected change averaged over 2081–2100.

The number of these models increased from CMIP5 to CMIP6. This points, again, to a different sensitivity to larger scale processes in the ocean, and it possibly explains part of the difference in ODSL between the two ensembles.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*